The contribution of the meningeal immune interface to neuroinflammation in traumatic brain injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of disability and mortality worldwide, particularly among the elderly, yet our mechanistic understanding of what renders the post-traumatic brain vulnerable to poor outcomes, and susceptible to neurological disease, is incomplete. It is well established that dysregulated and sustained immune responses elicit negative consequences after TBI; however, our understanding of the neuroimmune interface that facilitates crosstalk between central and peripheral immune reservoirs is in its infancy. The meninges serve as the interface between the brain and the immune system, facilitating important bi-directional roles in both healthy and disease settings. It has been previously shown that disruption of this system exacerbates neuroinflammation in age-related neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease; however, we have an incomplete understanding of how the meningeal compartment influences immune responses after TBI. In this manuscript, we will offer a detailed overview of the holistic nature of neuroinflammatory responses in TBI, including hallmark features observed across clinical and animal models. We will highlight the structure and function of the meningeal lymphatic system, including its role in immuno-surveillance and immune responses within the meninges and the brain. We will provide a comprehensive update on our current knowledge of meningeal-derived responses across the spectrum of TBI, and identify new avenues for neuroimmune modulation within the neurotrauma field.


Background
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability, posing a significant socioeconomic and public health burden, with an estimated 64-74 million people sustaining a TBI each year [1,2].While the prevalence of TBI is centered around young adults and the elderly [3,4], the consequences of TBI are more severe in aged populations.Slower recovery, worse functional, cognitive, and psychosocial outcomes, all highlight the influence of age on overall TBI pathogenesis [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Strikingly, there were 69,473 TBI-related deaths in the United States alone in 2021 [12], emphasizing the need for disease modifying interventions.There are no comprehensive pharmacological treatments for TBI, with the diversity of injury still considered a significant barrier toward the translation of effective therapeutics [13].Although TBI can be influenced by many variables, it is accepted that neuroinflammation contributes to negative outcomes after TBI.Evidence suggests that the synergistic functioning of innate and adaptive immune cells, crucial for orchestrating and sustaining a healthy brain microenvironment, becomes dysfunctional after TBI.This dysfunction results in sustained, uncontrolled neuroinflammatory responses which detrimentally affect outcomes and recovery timeframes.Indeed, therapies targeting inflammatory responses display efficacy in preclinical and single-center trials; however, they fail to show improvement in larger multicenter clinical trials [14,15].This may be due to the fact that the majority of preclinical TBI studies tend to analyze these cellular responses individually, with interventions focused on targeting a singular cell modality.It is now evident that neuroinflammatory responses in TBI are not confined to a single cell type, and it is more likely that a combination of complex cellular interactions determines the nature of inflammatory cascades.Therefore, in order to develop more effective therapeutics, we require a greater understanding of the bi-directional crosstalk between the innate and adaptive immune response and how they contribute holistically to TBI-induced neuroinflammation.

Neuroinflammation in TBI
The complexity and challenges in understanding cellular interactions and signaling cascades in TBI is largely due to the heterogenous nature of injury.Primary injury causes brain lesions from fractures, intracranial hemorrhage, epidural and subdural hematoma, brain contusion and direct mechanical damage to neural tissue.Secondary injury occurs immediately following head impact, initiating cascades including neuroinflammation that can persist for weeks and even years, contributing to neurological impairment.Temporally, primary injury results in blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction, neural damage, and release of endogenous damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs).These DAMPs subsequently engage pattern recognition receptors (PRR), such as the toll like receptors (TLRs) on innate (microglia/astrocytes) or adaptive (myeloid/lymphoid) cells, leading to their immune activation.The molecular diversity of DAMPs binding PRRs is vast (reviewed in [16]), and their significance after trauma is critical, with DAMP level correlating with injury severity and inversely related to clinical outcomes [17].Indeed, clinical insights offer invaluable translational knowledge to identify secondary injury triggers and processes, information that may identify avenues for therapeutic intervention.

Hallmarks of neuroinflammation in animal models of TBI
Animal models have proven invaluable for studying TBI and unraveling the complicated mechanisms underlying both primary and secondary injuries.Similar to clinical studies, pre-clinical models show BBB permeability within hours, with spontaneous closure at approximately 7-10 days post-injury [101][102][103][104][105]. Mechanistically, TBI has been shown to affect processes at the neurovascular unit, with reductions in tight junction proteins (claudins, occludins) and pericyte loss [104,[106][107][108]. Across the spectrum of TBI models, various signals and triggers are elevated following injury, including DAMPS, cytokines, chemokines and soluble factors similar to those previously identified in clinical studies.Critically, their time and cell dependent function can be influenced by a myriad of context dependent factors (Fig. 1).Broadly, experimental TBI increases levels of DAMPs including HMGB1, ATP, heat-shock, GM-CSF, mtDNA and S100 proteins and their receptors such as TLRs and receptors of advanced glycosylation end-products (RAGE) and purinergic receptors.In addition, alterations in levels of proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18, IFNγ, Type-I interferons (IFNs), anti-inflammatory cytokines Arg-1, IL-4, IL-10, TGF-β and chemokines IL-8, MCP1, CCL2, CCL5, CXCL2 are all involved within the holistic nature of inflammation in TBI models (detailed review in [14,109,110]).

Innate CNS responses
Microglia are resident central nervous system (CNS) immune cells, making about 10-13% of the cell population in the mouse and human brain [111,112].Their primary functions can be grouped to include surveillance, phagocytosis, and the secretion of soluble factors [113].To determine functionality, microglia react to changes and context specific stimuli within CNS, eliciting a diverse array of tailored responses.Indeed, advancements in technologies (transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics) have highlighted that categorizing microglia into simplistic dichotomies like "good or bad"
In healthy environments, microglia surveil their environment and can aid in synaptic remodeling, cell survival, and controlled phagocytosis removing CNS debris and waste products [114][115][116].Morphologically, Fig. 1 Hallmarks of neuroinflammation in Traumatic Brain Injury.Summary of hallmark characteristics that encompass the holistic nature of TBI-induced neuroinflammation.Based on decades of clinical research and mechanistic knowledge gained from the diverse range of injury models, key neuroinflammatory events include: barrier dysfunction, immune triggers and signaling, neural damage or release of soluble factors, neutrophil infiltration, monocyte recruitment, resident CNS microglial and astrocyte responses and activation of T and B cell responses.Importantly, all areas of this neuroinflammatory wheel can be influenced by context dependent factors, and should be considered across the spectrum of the neurotrauma field microglia are described as 'ramified' in their normal homeostatic state, and transform to a spectrum of morphologies during disease.In models of TBI, a dynamic range of TAMs are observed at both acute and chronic timepoints, initially clearing necrotic debris by adopting phagocytic states in response to ATP mediated purinergic signaling [117][118][119].In the days and weeks following TBI, microglial cells undertake various functions, including, but not limited to, initiating immune responses, synaptic engulfment and clearance phagocytosis, influencing neuronal activity through bidirectional synaptic contact with neurons, and the potential to promote neurogenesis [120][121][122][123].This dynamic functionality is generally delineated by the expression of Cd11b, CD68, CD86 and MHCII markers and accompanied by the release of proinflammatory mediators like TNF-α, IL-1β, NOX, IFNs or alternatively the expression of CD206 and Arg-1 markers and the release of anti-inflammatory factors including IL-10 and TGFβ [117,121,[124][125][126][127][128][129].Mechanistically, this functionality is determined by immune triggers that signal microglia to undergo morphological alterations resulting in highly activated states where they release soluble factors [118,130].Specifically, microglia are shown to respond to DAMPs activating PRRs, with TBI upregulating HMGB1, TLR2, TLR4 and NF-κB [31,[131][132][133].Moreover, TLR2-and TLR4-deficient mice display decreased levels of TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6 and NF-κB signaling, evidencing their role in the TBI-induced proinflammatory response [134,135].In addition to TLRs, purinergic receptors P2Y6, P2Y12, and P2X4, detect ATP released from damaged cells and influence microglial responses after TBI [118,119,136].Alongside the production of cytokines and chemokines, TAM also adopt functional states that promote oxidative stress through chronic NOX2 activation [137,138].In recent times, pharmacological depletion of microglia in the subacute and chronic timepoints after TBI is shown to be neuroprotective and improves outcomes [127,139], underscoring the key role they play in deleterious TBI-induced neuroinflammatory responses.
Similar to microglia, astrocytes undergo morphological, molecular, and functional remodeling, with their classification now determined by the sum of their multifactorial impact in context specific pathological settings [140].In healthy contexts, astrocytes contribute to immune signaling, synaptogenesis regulation, BBB formation and maintenance, neurotransmitter recycling, ion and water homeostasis, and blood flow control [141][142][143][144][145]. In TBI, astrocytes are best known for the formation of the glial scar as a protective mechanism to limit secondary injury and promote regeneration [104,[146][147][148][149]. Astrogliosis is categorized by increased GFAP + and vimentin across TBI models, yet away from the glial scar, the morphological significance of this gliosis is temporally and spatially dynamic [14].They contribute to brain edema after injury [150][151][152], and contain decreased expression of GLT-1, GLAST and EAAT1/2, evidencing their role in TBI-induced glutamate dysregulation [153][154][155][156].They also contribute directly to immune responses through DAMP/TLRs signaling as well as proinflammatory cytokine and chronic complement production after TBI [157][158][159][160]. Recent advances in high throughput sequencing and 'omic analysis has generated datasets to begin to unravel the context specific nature of astrocytes in TBI [127,[161][162][163][164], yet these studies are still in early stages, especially when considering the range of heterogeneous immune responses that underpin the hallmark characteristics of TBI (Fig. 1).Furthermore, these responses often involve more than just a single cell type, exhibiting bidirectional communication, as evidenced by HMGB1 release from necrotic neurons, activating microglial TLR4, and subsequently increasing levels of astrocytic aquaporin-4 (AQP4), influencing BBB dynamics after TBI [31].Indeed, this communication is now being explored in disease settings, with microglial release of C1q, IL1β and TNFα shown to transform astrocytes into neurotoxic states via their secretion of lipids contained in APOE and APOJ [165][166][167].Blockade of this interaction is beneficial after stroke [168], suggesting studies of this pathway in TBI may yield promising targets to reduce inflammation mediated cell death pathways.

Adaptive immune responses
Peripheral interactions and cell specific processes play important roles in the overall neuroinflammatory response in TBI.Temporally, within minutes an initial wave of neutrophils crosses the BBB to phagocytose injured tissue, followed by potent chemoattractant signals that encourage the migration and infiltration of peripheral macrophages and lymphocytes (Fig. 1).The temporal series of these cellular events within the brain parenchyma has been extensively reviewed elsewhere [169,170].Within the scope of this review, we would like to discuss the contribution of the adaptive immune response in relation to its interaction at meningeal barriers, including the recently discovered immune rich lymphatic vessel interface.

Meningeal structures and barriers
The meninges, essential components of the CNS's protective and functional architecture, are composed of three distinct layers: the innermost pia mater, the intermediate arachnoid, and the outer dura mater.Structurally, the dura predominantly comprises collagen fibers that anchor it to the skull, as well as thin layer of fibroblasts demarcating the dura from the arachnoid [171].In addition, the dura contains fenestrated blood vessels and lymphatics that form a connection with the periphery [171][172][173][174][175][176].Beneath the dura lies the arachnoid barrier layer, composed of an outer layer of epithelial-like cells interconnected by tight junctions [177,178].It is this barrier that serves as a key component of the blood-CSF barrier, restricting the movement of molecules from the dura to the subarachnoid space [171,175,179].The subarachnoid space plays host to vasculature networks and immune cells, with arachnoid trabeculae consisting of flattened fibroblasts-like cells connecting the arachnoid to the pia [180,181].CSF flows within this space and provides brain nourishment and buoyancy, as well as waste removal via venous flow and resorptive transport in the choreoid plexus [182,183].Tightly adhered to the brain, the pia mater is composed of a thin layer of fibroblasts, followed by a basement membrane that separates it from the underlying glia limitans.Collectively the arachnoid and pia are commonly referred to as the leptomeninges [184], within which the non-fenestrated vasculature contains tight junctions to form the leptomeningeal barrier [184][185][186][187]. Lastly, the glial limitans is constituted by astrocytic end feet processes to form a boundary between the brain parenchyma and the pia.

Meningeal lymphatic vessels (mLVs)
The presence of lymphatic vasculature within the meninges, though hinted at and often misconstrued in various anatomical accounts in the seventeenth century [188], was first visually depicted in the late eighteenth century by the anatomist Paolo Mascagni [189].However, subsequent to this, knowledge of these lymphatic vessels lapsed into relative obscurity until the mid-twentieth century [190].Its 'rediscovery' in modern times in both mice [173,175] and humans [174,176] had led to a resurgent wave of interest within the neurosciences, challenging the long-lasting dogma of the "immuneprivileged" brain.Anatomically, healthy meningeal lymphatic vessels (mLVs) are found alongside dural sinuses, arteries and veins, including the superior sagittal sinus, transverse sinus, sigmoid sinus, retroglenoid vein, rostral rhinal vein, middle meningeal artery, and pterygopalatine artery [173,175,[191][192][193][194].Insights into the mechanistic development of lymphatic vessels is largely drawn from studies of networks in peripheral tissues.In mice, lymphatic vasculature (LV) formation is predominantly venous-derived, originating from the cardinal vein during embryogenesis.At embryonic day 9.5 (E9.5), a subpopulation of venous endothelial cells express Sox18 (a SRY-related HMG-box transcription factor), which activates prospero homeobox 1 (PROX1) [195][196][197][198].This PROX1 activation induces specific lymphatic endothelial cell (LEC) gene expression, and inhibits blood endothelial cell-specific genes by binding to the nuclear receptors COUP-TFII [199][200][201][202]. Indeed, Prox1 −/− endothelial cells fail to express LEC markers, instead retaining blood vascular endothelial properties [195], evidencing their role as a master regulator of lymphatic identity.Ultimately Sox18-PROX1 activation initiates the acquisition of LEC properties for the subsequent creation of lymph sacs and lymphatic vessel networks [203,204].Additional lymphangiogenic mediators include lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (LYVE-1), which increases the expression of the platelet aggregating protein podoplanin (PDPN), in LECs at E12.5.Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 (VEGFR-3) is also essential for the sprouting of LVs from the embryonic veins [205,206], allowing for the ability of LECs to migrate and form the lymphatic sacs, visible at E12.5 [207].Buds and sprouts progress until E14.5, by which time the lymphatic development stage is completed [208,209].
In contrast to the embryonic formation of peripheral LV, the development of the intracranial mLV occurs postnatally, in a VEGF-C dependent manner [210].Starting at the base of the skull LEC sprouting begins at birth, postnatal P0.Temporally, lymphangiogenesis continues in a characteristic pattern alongside veins, arteries, and cranial nerves during the first weeks.The mLVs appear at the cribriform plate at P2, middle meningeal artery after P4, and grow into the transverse sinus at P8 [210].Between P13 and P20, lymphatic vessels expand along the transverse sinus appearing at the confluence of sinuses at P16 [191,210], before extending the length of the superior sagittal sinus toward the olfactory bulb by P20 [191].At this time, the mLVs become functional, draining content from the CNS into the peripheral lymphatic system at the base of the skull, with the mLV network fully developed at approximately P28 [175,191,192,[210][211][212].
In terms of functionality, mLVs can be categorized into thin-walled "initial" lymphatic vessels, and the larger "collecting" vessels.In mice, initial lymphatic vessels are highly permeable and are located dorsally near both the transverse and superior sagittal sinus.Initial lymphatics lack smooth muscle cell (SMC) coverage, and are composed of discontinuous button-like LEC junctions [173,175,213].These button-shaped junctions consist of tight junction-and adherens associated proteins, that attach adjoining LECs at the base of interdigitating flaps between cells [214][215][216].This flap-like overlap creates mini-valves that permit the entry of interstitial fluid, macromolecules, soluble antigens and immune cells including antigen presenting cells (APCs) [215][216][217][218][219][220][221].In contrast, collecting lymphatic vessels at the base of the skull are surrounded by SMCs to help propel fluid movement and contain tight continuous zipper-like connections and secondary intraluminal valves [217,220].This makes them virtually impermeable, facilitating unidirectional drainage, whilst simultaneously preventing lymphatic backflow [222,223].In both mice and humans, collecting meningeal lymphatic vessels extend along the jugular vein, exit the skull through various foramina, before merging with peripheral collecting lymphatics that predominantly drain into the deep cervical lymph nodes (dCLNs) [173,174,192,210,[224][225][226].On the journey between initial to collecting lymphatics, fluid transitions into specialized pre-collecting lymphatic vessels.Located at the basal foramina, they exhibit features of both initial and collecting vessels, as they lack SMC, but contain one-way valves and a mix of both button-and zipperlike junctions [192,227].These findings emphasize the distinct morphological characteristics of various mLV subsets, providing insight into their specialized roles in immune cell and CSF waste clearance cascades from the CNS to the periphery.

The (previously missing) link from the brain to the periphery
The 2015 multi-group discovery of mLVs in the dura mater, evidenced a role for these vessels as an initial collection site for CSF before its drainage to the dCLNs.Physically, the arachnoid barrier delineates the CSF contained in the subarachnoid space from the dura mater; however, the mechanism by which the CSF carrying waste products and immune signals from the brain reaches these mLVs in the dura was unclear.It has previously been suggested that arachnoid granulations, which are protrusions of the arachnoid mater into the venous sinuses of the dura mater, enabled drainage of CSF directly to the bloodstream [228], but tracers administrated into the CNS or CSF can drain directly to the dCLNs, demonstrating that there must be a direct route from the CSF to the dura that bypasses the bloodstream [194].In 2024, a pioneering study identified arachnoid mater cuffs around the bridging veins that connect the subarachnoid space to the dura [229].This finding was made by experiments that involve injecting tracers into the intracisternal magna (i.c.m) and observing their transport.The experiments revealed that the i.c.m. tracers were being transported into the dura before they had reached either the blood or the dCLNs, indicating that the drainage occurred directly from the CSF into the dura before being drained out by lymphatic vessels.This connection between the dura mater and the subarachnoid space consists of bridging veins that create discontinuities in the arachnoid barrier, forming structures termed arachnoid cuff exit (ACE) points.ACE points are present in humans and can work bi-directionally, enabling molecules and immune cells to enter from the dura mater into the brain [229].This may explain how cytokine responses from meningeal immune cells influence brain function, a discovery that will shape the way we think about neuroinflammation in future TBI studies.

The immunological environment within the meninges
It is now recognized that the meningeal layers act as vital immunological reservoirs, hosting an array of adaptive immune cells that first arrive in development via blood vessels or calvarium bone marrow that connects the dura via specialized vascular channels [211,[230][231][232][233][234][235].Collectively, the meningeal layers contain lymphoid cells, macrophages, mast cells, eosinophils, dendritic cells (type 1 and type 2 classical dendritic cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells and migratory dendritic cells), neutrophils, innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), natural killer cells, plasma cells, B cells (immature and mature) and T cells (CD4, CD8 and T cell receptor gamma/delta (TCRγδ)) [186,211,231,[236][237][238][239][240].Proportionally, the distribution of these cells varies across layers, with the dura largely thought to contain a higher diversity and frequency of immune cells versus the leptomeningeal layer [186].This may be attributed to the need for tissue specific support, with the niche environment around dural sinuses containing innate lymphoid cells, macrophages, T cells, B cells and plasma cells [234,241].In leptomeningeal layers, macrophages, CD4, and CD8 cells, are found in large part around blood vessels in the CSF containing subarachnoid space [242][243][244][245].

Meningeal macrophages
Macrophages are heterogeneous groups of cells that carry out distinct functions depending on their location and phenotype [246].Meningeal macrophages belong to a specialized group called border associated macrophages (BAMs), originating from yolk sac CD206 + myeloid progenitor cells [230].In the adult, leptomeningeal BAMs can be transcriptionally delineated by CD206, Lyve1, P2rx7, and Egfl7 expression [186,236].In contrast, adult dural BAMs differ to their leptomeningeal counterparts as they lack Lyve-1 expression, and can be transcriptionally divided into subgroups based on major histocompatibility complex II (MHCII) expression [247,248].This may represent divergent roles under homeostatic or disease conditions, with MHCII Hi BAMs displaying enhanced levels of CCR2, whereas MHCII low BAMs contain gene signatures that include Clec4n, Clec10a and Folr2 expression [186,211,246,249].Of note, a determining factor that drives postnatal MHCII high or low differentiation, is the fms intronic regulatory element (FIRE), a highly conserved super enhancer of the colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) and its downstream signaling [250,251].This may be pertinent to consider in studies examining microglial driven inflammation in CSF1R deletion models (or via Pexidartinib (PLX) inhibition), as the effect of CSF1R in modulating facets of meningeal immunity has yet to be fully investigated.In healthy settings the functional role of BAMs is largely unknown, however evidence suggests they can act as sentinels in anti-viral defense.Following lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection (LCMV), BAMs become rapidly activated, acquire the viral antigen and trigger engagement by infiltrating cytotoxic T lymphocytes that are essential to resolve the infection [252].Further, the type-1 interferon-Stat1 anti-viral pathway is induced in BAMs, blocking further LCMV infection [253].Transcranial delivery of PLX3397 or PLX5622 to specifically deplete BAMs resulted in the death of LCMV-infected mice [253], emphasizing the importance of further investigation into BAMs in CNS disease models that contain inflammatory components within their etiology.

Border associated dendritic cells
Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional APCs that play key roles in immune surveillance in both peripheral and meningeal layers [254].DCs in the meninges and choroid plexus arise from circulating and skull bone marrow precursor-DCs, which transform into conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) at these sites [233,255,256].Investigations into their trafficking ability, revealed that peripheral DCs can migrate into the CNS across barrier sites via the C-C motif chemokine receptor 2, chemokine ligand 2 (CCR2-CCL2) signaling pathway [257].This migration can be bi-directional, with DCs observed in the cervical and auxiliary lymph nodes 3-7 days after their injection into the CSF or brain parenchyma [258][259][260].Meningeal mediated migratory drainage of DC occurs via initial mLVs in a CCR7 dependent manner.CCR7 is a potent receptor of DC migration toward the ligands CCL19 and CCL21, which are highly expressed by lymphatic vessels (Fig. 2).In pathological states, DCs recognize and capture antigens, upregulate CCR7 and migrate to initial mLVs before draining into the dCLNs where they can activate antigen-specific T-cell inflammatory responses [173,225,239,261].Indeed, dural and cribriform plate mLVs express CCL21, facilitating a gradient for DC migration and drainage into peripheral lymph nodes [175,211,225,262].Additionally, dural fibroblastlike cells express CCL19, providing further stimulus for CCR7 mediated signaling within the meninges; however, the role of these fibroblasts in relation to CNS lymphatic drainage is yet to be elucidated [211].Collectively, DC populations within the meninges and CSF may contain both parenchymal infiltrating DCs as well as migratory draining DCs in transit to lymph nodes, suggesting that the holistic neuroinflammatory environment unique to specific disease states influences DC capacity, drainage and antigen presentation.

Border associated T cells
The interplay between the innate CNS and adaptive immune response contributes to neuroinflammation within disease contexts.T cells are found in the meningeal space, with populations identified at dural and cribriform lymphatic sites [173,192,262].Initial evidence of T cell migration into dCLNs was noted 12-48 h after their CNS injection into healthy or lesioned mice [263], with subsequent lymphatic ablation studies offering extensive characterization of T cell migration pathways via dural mLVs [225].Mechanistically, drainage of T cells into the dCLNs via mLVs occurs in a CCR7 dependent manner [225], a process similar to that seen in inflammatoryinduced peripheral T cell migration [264,265].Indeed, CCR7 expressing T cells are found in human CSF, most of which are thought to be central memory T cells conducting immune surveillance within the healthy subarachnoid space [266,267].While trafficking to dCLNs may reduce meningeal T cell pools, they are replenished by blood circulating T cells that enter the brain via the dural sinuses, and adopt tissue-resident phenotypes [211,231].Indeed, evidence shows elevated densities of APCs and T cells at dural sinuses, serving as an active site for APCs to acquire blood-or brain-borne pathological antigens, presenting them to local T cells [211].Functionally, the role of a well-regulated adaptive immune response is paramount, as CD4 + and TCRγδ cells can influence CNS neuronal, glial, and homeostatic activities through cytokine secretions including IL-4, IL-17 and IFNγ [231,[268][269][270][271][272].Furthermore, mice lacking functional T cells, and consequently deficient T cell drainage to dCLNs, have notable deficits in exploratory, social, and cognitive behaviors.[268,273,274].These deficits are reversed following adoptive transfer of T cells or secondary lymphoid organ lymphocytes, further evidencing their important role in the regulation of CNS behaviors [268,274,275].

Border associated B cells
B cells play versatile roles within the adaptive immune response.Known predominantly for their antibody production and as precursors to antibody-producing plasma cells, they also function as APCs, and producers of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (reviewed in [276]).In humans, the expression of B cells and plasma cells is sparse within the CNS parenchyma [277,278], however they are abundantly located in the meninges [277], specifically the dural layer [279].In mice, the identification of meningeal B220 + CD11c − B cells was first reported within the dural mLVs [173], with subsequent single-cell sequencing studies identifying a diverse range of progenitor, early and resident B cell populations [234,[279][280][281]. Constitutively, B cells represent ~ 15-30% of all CD45 hi cells within the dural meninges, encompassing multiple stages of B cell development from pro-B to mature B cells [234,279].Meningeal B cells derive locally from the calvaria bone marrow niche before migrating to the meninges through specialized skull vascular channels [234].Following this calvarial-meningeal migration, B cells complete their development locally, with factors such as CXCL12 and CXCR4 critical for their survival and differentiation [234].IL-7 has also been implicated in supporting B cell development, alongside other niche factors in the meninges including the CNS specific antigen myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein [281].For the most part, the majority of mature B cells in the CNS are naïve IgM + cells, with small numbers of IgA + B cells [234,279].In terms of migration, B cells have the capacity to drain to the dCLNs via mLV in a similar fashion to their Fig. 2 The meningeal neuroimmune interface influencing inflammatory responses in TBI.Simplified schematic of the meningeal interface in healthy and injured settings.In homeostatic conditions (left), border-associated immune cells may synergistically support brain environments through cytokine secretion (IL-4, IL-17), which can directly influence neurons.A network of initial and collecting mLVs expressing Lyve1, drain CSF solutes/molecules to the dCLNs.Immune cell drainage of dendritic and T cells into the dCLNs occurs via chemokine gradients (E.g.CCR7 expressing cells migrating towards its ligands CCL19 and CCL21).TBI (right) causes BBB breakdown and mLV dysfunction, resulting in reduced Lyve + mLVs, and impaired drainage of solutes to the dCLNs.This TBI-induced lymphatic dysfunction and immune activation at the meningeal interface, exacerbates neuroinflammation by resident CNS cells within the brain parenchyma T cell counterparts.Plasma cells (IgA + ) are also found in the meninges, with a portion of this population derived from gut plasma cells [282].This meningeal plasma cell expression is age dependent, with young mice displaying IgA+ cells, switching to an IgG + and IgM + plasma cell phenotype in aged mice [234].

Neuroimaging of meningeal disruption in clinical TBI
Neuroimaging provides valuable data to assist in patient evaluation and diagnosis following TBI.Common imaging modalities include conventional non-contrast computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), often used in the clinical work-up for injury indications in patients with GCS < 13 [283].CT scans provide initial class I assessment of injury extent (lesion, fracture), extradural, subdural or intracranial hemorrhage, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage and ventricular abnormalities [284,285].This data is beneficial for diagnosing the mechanically induced primary trauma, yet sophisticated imaging techniques are necessary to detect subtle injuries to the brain structure and secondary injury processes.Enhanced imaging of dysregulated secondary injury cascades including glucose metabolism (functional MRI), diffuse axonal injury (diffusion tensor imaging, DTI), protein accumulation and neuroinflammation (radiotracer positron emission tomography, PET) could lead to the discovery of new imaging biomarkers and therapeutics [286].
Advancements in MRI using contrast agents (such as gadolinium) have improved the specificity of diagnostic images, allowing for identification of novel biomarkers and insights into disease progression [287,288].Ordinarily gadolinium is unable to cross the blood-brain barrier, and therefore acts as a surrogate for leakage of proteins and other macromolecules when detected outside of the vasculature [289].Gadolinium post-contrast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)-MRI merges a high intensity of T2 weighting with the attenuation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) signal.This allows for the detection of leakage of the gadolinium contrast agent across damaged barriers into the CSF space, and highlights hyperintense regions at CSF adjacent borders.This is relevant in the context of TBI, as vascular injury can occur in the parenchyma and vessels traversing the meninges [290].Meningeal arteries and veins in the dura and subarachnoid space are particularly vulnerable to the primary impact of TBI.Indeed, recent findings suggest that Traumatic Meningeal Enhancement (TME), associated with meningeal injury and inflammation, is a novel biomarker observed by FLAIR-MRI in patients following TBI (Table 2).
Although meningeal enhancement has been observed in neuroinflammatory contexts and in neurological disease [299][300][301], its identification in TBI is a relatively recent development (Table 2).In 2014, Roth and colleagues first reported focal enhancement of the meninges in approximately 50% of patients following a mild TBI (mTBI) [119].A temporal follow up study identified similar TBI induced TME positive patients (50%) [293], of which 76% displayed resolution by approximately 22 days post-injury; however, 17% had persistent TME for several months (72 to 103 days post injury) [293].This TME time course may be associated with, and influenced by, injury severity, with TME detected in moderate to severe TBI patients at 1-year post injury [296].Collectively, these likely represent chronic inflammatory or other secondary injury cascades occurring within this compartment in the weeks, months, and years post-injury.Anatomically, TME positive mTBI patients display thick linear meningeal enhancement of the dura, including diffuse and localized convexity patterns, as well as enhancement of the falx cerebri [119,289,291,292].As the volume of data and studies expand, the diagnostic value of positive TME findings has become more apparent.TME signatures have been shown to be associated with loss of consciousness, implying clinically significant head injury [291], and FLAIR imaging protocol demonstrate superiority in detecting trauma-related abnormalities not visible on CT scans, distinguishing between acute trauma from nonspecific conditions [292].Specifically, FLAIR protocols outperform T1W1 post-contrast sequence in identifying the presence or absence of TME, where T1W1 failed to show it in 38% of patients where it was readily shown using FLAIR [295].To gain insights into biological mechanisms associated with TBI-induced meningeal enhancement, transcriptomic analysis from patients with TME identified 76 differentially expressed genes, including increases in IgA, FCαR, MCTP2, GPR2, and decreases in CD79A [294].Furthermore, innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are found in the dura and CSF of TBI patients, suggesting meningeal immune interactions [298].Increases in VEGF2 expression in meningeal vasculature [297], suggests regenerative capacity of dural vessels; however, this finding should be repeated in subjects with clinical classification data, for meaningful translational interpretation.

Meningeal lymphatic dysfunction after TBI
Neuroinflammation, characterized by the intricate interplay between innate and adaptive immune responses, contributes to the pathophysiology of TBI (Fig. 1).A fine balance exists whereby acute activation of neuroimmune cells may be a beneficial physiological response to promote injury resolution, in contrast to aberrant neuroimmune activation that may manifest toward deleterious chronic outcomes.Identification of the immune rich lymphatic system at the meningeal barrier interface, has triggered a new area of previously unexplored research, investigating the contribution of this neuroimmune crosstalk to TBI-induced neuroinflammatory responses (Table 3) In 2020, Bolte et al. reported seminal findings evidencing the temporal series (across seven timepoints) of meningeal lymphatic disruptions in a closed head impact model of TBI.Here, they detail mLV drainage of CSF molecules to the dCLNs is impaired as early as 2 h, and persists for at least 1-month, following injury [302].This impaired drainage was associated with changes to lymphatic vasculature, with a decrease in Lyve-1 expression observed within the first 2 to 24 h post-injury [302].Interestingly, mLVs demonstrated a capacity for regenerative lymphangiogenesis, evidenced by the spontaneous increase of Lyve-1 coverage and complexity in meningeal whole mount preparations 1-2 weeks post injury [302].Photothrombotic vascular damage to the dura mater and pia mater causes immediate vascular degeneration followed by revascularization at 7d post-injury [297], suggesting that changes in mLVs may occur in parallel with regenerative endothelial angiogenesis at dural sites (Fig. 2).However, across the spectrum of TBI, the extent of this naturally occurring vascular and lymphangiogenic responses varies upon injury type and severity.Lyve-1 + mLV coverage/ expression is decreased at 3d (mice, impact 1.9atm) [303] and 7d (rats, impact 2.6 atm) [304] after lateral  fluid percussion injury (FPI).MRI of a closed-head impact model of engineered rotational acceleration (CHIMERA) shows meningeal enhancement 7d after single and repeat injury, reflecting clinical observations [305].Controlled cortical impact (CCI) in mice presents mixed findings: Lyve-1 + morphology is increased at 7 d (impact 1.5 mm) [306], with contrasting studies showing decreases at 3 d (impact 2 mm) [307], and 1 month (impact undisclosed) [308], highlighting the nuanced and variable nature of spontaneous lymphangiogenic responses across varied mechanisms of impact and injury parameters.Regardless, if plasticity of the lymphatic network can be induced, it may be beneficial to improve outcomes (Fig. 2).Indeed, across models of TBI, overexpression of VEGF-C drives lymphangiogenesis, enhances functional drainage and improves injury induced neurological deficits, including those seen in aged animals [303,304,306,[308][309][310].

TBI-induced meningeal damage
The meninges host a diverse array of immune cells, as previously outlined, yet the precise details of their locations (whether in the leptomeninges or dura) and trafficking patterns in TBI still remain largely unknown.Initial studies at the meningeal interface classified the nature of damage to the barrier itself, followed by the temporal response to direct meningeal injury.Acutely, closed head meningeal compression injury (achieved by a unique skull thinning model) is characterized by rapid meningeal macrophage cell death attributed to vascular leakage and the release of reactive oxygen species [119], and also causes secondary damage to the glial limitans and brain parenchyma within the first few hours [119,293].The initial injury is followed by neutrophil swarming into the meninges (within 1 h), that is essential for regeneration of the initially damaged glial limitans [119].Elevated proinflammatory cytokines IL1α/IL1β are seen in the meninges at 6 h to 1 d, as well as the chemoattractants Cxcl1 (neutrophils) and Ccl2/Ccl12 (monocytes) [293].Over the course of a week after injury, infiltrating myeloid cells (CX3CR1 lo-neg CCR2 hi monocytes) scavenge dead cells at the meningeal lesion core, while woundhealing macrophages (CX3CR1 hi CCR2 lo-neg CD206 + ) proliferate along the lesion perimeter to promote angiogenesis through the clearance of fibrin and production of MMP-2 [293].These studies at the level of the meninges evidenced the importance of the previously unexplored barrier immunity, setting the stage to address bi-directional interactions containing both extra-axial meningeal cascades and intra-axial brain parenchyma responses.

Modulating meningeal lymphatics in TBI
Impairment studies shed more light on how the meningeal compartments influence CNS responses, with ablation of mLVs exacerbating resident glial cell (GFAP + , IBA1 + ) immunoreactivity, increasing complement, reducing neuronal health markers and which collectively influenced cognitive outcomes [309].Furthermore, administration of the pro-lymphangiogenic VEGF-C to aged mice reduced brain gliosis and improved cognition.Integrating adaptive immunity, TBI induces the accumulation of Granzyme B + CD8 + cytotoxic T cells, a response preceded by increases in IL-17-producing CD4 + T cells and IFNγ-producing CD4 + T cells [311].This sequence is significant, given Th17 cell responses through IL-17 and IL-21, can enhance the cytotoxic capability of CD8 + T cells [311].In K14-VEGFR3-Ig (TG) mice that have defective growth and lack mLVs alongside sclerotic dCLNs, a reduction in the perilesional infiltration of T-cells is observed [312].Specifically, TBI-K14-VEGFR3-Ig mice show reduced levels of infiltrating CD4 + T cells, suggesting that trauma induced brain-derived antigens may be partially drained through the mLVs to the dCLNs to elicit Th-2 mediated responses [312].Indeed, lymphatic vessels and LECs themselves play a direct chemoattractant role in the maturation of T cells, naive T cells into a memory-like subset of quiescent yet antigen-experienced CD8 + cells that can rapidly differentiate into an effector upon inflammatory antigenic challenge [313].Dendritic antigen presenting cells can also survey the inflammatory CNS milieu, traverse the mLVs in a CCR7, CCL19 and CCL21 manner, and interact with T cells in the dCLNs.During trauma, DCs are elevated and influence post-injury immune responses [129,259,314,315], yet this meningeal migration of DCs downstream activation of adaptive immune responses hasn't been studied in the context of TBI.

Insights from transcriptomic approaches
In order to gain a greater understanding of the cell specific responses that occur in the meninges after TBI, we and others have taken a transcriptomic approach [184,302,316,317].scRNA-seq shows increased meningeal macrophages, CD8 + T cells, T helper cells Th2 and Th17, immature-mature B cells, dendritic cells, and fibroblasts in meningeal compartments at 1-week post injury [302].Similarly, we identified time dependent alterations in the meningeal transcriptome.T-cells respond acutely, followed by chronic B-cell and immunoglobulin production in an age dependent manner, which may be regulated by upstream Type-1 IFNs, Ccr2 and IL-33 interactions [317].Supporting this, meningeal macrophages display strong type-1 IFN signatures (elevated IFNβ and IRF5) and sub cluster into "inflammatory" and "resolution" classes [302].Resolution macrophages express of antigen presentation-related genes (H2-Eb1, H2-Ab1, H2-Aa, Cd74) and anti-inflammatory genes Stab1, Nrros, and Dab2 which are involved in suppression of type I IFN responses.Conversely, meningeal inflammatory macrophages are defined by their expression of Ccr2 and chemotaxis genes Ccr7, Ccl22, and Ccl5.

Future avenues for neuroimmune investigation
These seminal pre-clinical studies of the meningeal response after TBI prompt numerous inquiries for future investigation within the field of neurotrauma.Not only do the meninges harbor immune cells that contribute to a vast array of responses, the mLVs play a crucial role as the waste-removal system in draining CSF, ISF, and CNS-derived molecules from the brain parenchyma to the dCLNs.The effect of their damage caused by primary injury and how that influences removal of proteins such as Aβ and tau remain to be characterized.Additionally, stratification of the level of damage to the LVs, subsequent lymphangiogenic recovery, and the effect on the flow of CSF throughout the brain is still to be characterized.Transcriptomic studies suggest inflammatory molecules may regulate meningeal derived inflammatory responses, particularly chemokines.Indeed, modulation of the CCR2-CCL2 signaling axis in TBI has been shown to be beneficial [77,[318][319][320].CCL2 −/− mice show delayed reductions in lesion size beginning at 28 days post injury.It might be postulated that this delayed response may be due to deficiency in meningeal mLV acutely, prior to lymphangiogenic recovery, in combination with altered CCL2 chronic immune responses.Indeed, CCR2 −/− mice show altered monocyte/macrophage influx and reduced crosstalk with innate cells, inhibiting the generation of type-1 IFN microglial responses after TBI, with pharmacological blockade of CCR2 improving cognitive outcomes at 28-day timepoints [318,319].Populations of macrophages after TBI were Mrc1 + Lyve1 + [319] suggesting microglial cross communication between meningeal cells, and as of now investigations into TBI mediated CCR2-CCL2 axis at the mLV immune interface are yet to be conducted, potentially warranting future investigation.Alongside CCL2, CCL7 has been observed in the meninges single TBI [316].CCR7 is expressed in a variety of peripheral immune cells including DCs and T-cells.Given CCR7 + immune cells migrate to the dCLNs via a CCL19 and CCL21 chemokine gradient (Brandum et al., 2021), suggests the potential DCs (that have phagocytosed TBI-induced antigens) and naïve T-cells migrate into LVs and dCLNs and present antigens to naïve CD8 + T-cells and CD4 + T-cells and activate them in response to TBI.Future studies investigating this potential using agonists/antagonists or conditional CCR7Ko models may be of interest to examine pathway influences neuroimmune outcomes and cognition in TBI, similar to that observed in 5xFAD models [239].Most importantly, these questions may be influenced by factors like age, sex, and injury severity.Future studies should incorporate these variables to stratify the immune response at the meningeal interface following traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Conclusions
TBI introduces a complex interplay between neuroinflammatory responses and immune dysregulation.We now understand that the meninges play a role in modulating this neuroinflammatory response, serving as the interface between the brain and the immune system; however, we still do not fully understand the mechanisms underlying prolonged neuroinflammation or how the temporal progression of damage to the meningeal lymphatic vessels influences cell trafficking and resolution.After TBI, immune cells (monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils) are available at the meningeal interface to immediately influence the brain, and infiltrating cells such as T and B cells can still be found in the brain and meningeal interface months following the injury.Does the presence of meningeal immune cells and the soluble factors released in response to trauma signal to, and amplify, the innate microglial responses?Are these cells being constantly trafficked into the brain, attracted by continuous damage signals?Do invading immune cells enter the CNS to mediate damage, but are unable to exit due to trauma-induced mLV dysfunction?Targeting the ability of immune cells to enter the CNS in response to injury, enhancing their ability to drain from the CNS, and gaining a better understanding of the crosstalk between the brain, meninges, and dCLN will allow us to harness the power of the immune system to enhance recovery from TBI.

Table 3
Meningeal insights in pre-clinical models of traumatic brain injury